U O Z

Loading

What is TQA?

The University of Zakho implements an integrated Teaching Quality Assurance (TQA) system aligned with:

  • Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research regulations,
  • Bologna Process principles,
  • European Standards and Guidelines (ESG).

Core Mechanisms

The TQA system operates through three interconnected mechanisms:

  • Student Feedback (SF): Student-centered evaluation aligned with ESG principles.
  • Continuous Academic Development (CAD): Monitoring and assessment of academic development, research, and professional growth.
  • Teaching Staff Portfolio (TP): Comprehensive annual performance evaluation.

Stakeholders Covered by TQA

Academic Staff:

  • All teaching staff at university departments.
  • Administrative post holders involved in teaching.
  • PhD students engaged in teaching activities.
  • Academic staff working at university presidency units (if teaching).

 

Students:

  • Undergraduate students (course evaluation).
  • Postgraduate students (program evaluation).
  • All enrolled students (mandatory feedback participation).
  • Student representatives involved in quality processes.

 

Administrative Leadership:

  • College Quality Assurance Staff (employees)
  • Department QA Coordinators.
  • College QA Officers.
  • University QA Directorate.
  • Ministry-level QA authorities.

Stakeholder Benefits

For Academic Staff:

  • Clear performance expectations.
  • Career development pathways.
  • Professional training and development opportunities.
  • Recognition through quality-related awards.

 

For Students:

  • Improved teaching quality.
  • Active participation in quality enhancement.
  • Better learning materials and assessment methods.
  • Preparation for international mobility and employment.

 

For the Institution:

  • Systematic quality enhancement.
  • Improved national and international rankings.
  • Accreditation readiness.
  • Sustainable culture of academic excellence.

 

For Society:

  • Qualified graduates aligned with labor market needs.
  • Research contributions to national development.
  • Enhanced regional and international reputation.

Compliance and Accountability

Mandatory Participation for

  • Academic staff: compulsory participation in CAD, Portfolio, and Student Feedback.
  • Students: mandatory participation during evaluation periods.
  • Administrators: responsible for implementing QA processes.
  • Institution: annual reporting to relevant authorities.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

  • Academic staff: performance-related consequences.
  • Students: reduced representation in quality improvement.
  • Administrators: evaluation linked to QA implementation.
  • Institution: impact on accreditation, ranking, and ministerial support.